Article 11.06.2019 2 min. read Text Who Targets Me (us) and What Can I (we) Do About It – Katarzyna Szymielewicz’s speech at the 2019 edition of Personal Democracy Forum is already available online (on YouTube).We live in social networks on tech platforms. We were attracted there with the promise of access (to all the information possible), choice (personalised experience) and community. We would still like to think of ourselves as users. But after more than 10 years of this experiment we should rather define ourselves as targets. Our online profiles, based on three layers of data, serves as an exploited resource for commercial entities that organise our online life. The predictions that they form on the basis of our profiles are used to influence us, also in the context of politics. There is, however, scarce evidence of how the so-called political microtargeting is used. Tools developed by tech platforms have limitations: all we see are Facebook profiles and not real names, there is no detailed information about criteria used for targeting, and we have to rely on what Facebook itself classified as political. Apart from new transparency and electoral regulations we need stronger evidence on what is really going on. And here comes our role as civil society organisations. This year, on the occassion of European elections and Polish parliamentary elections Panoptykon will test transparency tools for political advertising prepared by Facebook and Google as well as use the WhoTargetsMe plugin and build up our research with other methods. Fundacja Panoptykon Author Previous Next See also Report Algorithms of trauma: new case study shows that Facebook doesn’t give users real control over disturbing surveillance ads A case study examined by Panoptykon Foundation and showcased by the Financial Times, demonstrates how Facebook uses algorithms to deliver personalised ads that may exploit users’ mental vulnerabilities. The experiment shows that users are unable to get rid of disturbing content: disabling sensitive… 28.09.2021 Text Article Discrimination in datafied world Data-driven technologies are not neutral. A decision to collect, analyse and process specific kind of information is structured and motivated by social, economic and political factors. Those data operations may not only violate the right to privacy but also lead to discrimination and oppression of… 10.07.2018 Text Article Reclaiming the Algorithm: What the DSA can—and can’t—fix about recommender systems For nearly a decade, Panoptykon has explored legal and technological solutions to protect vulnerable individuals, and society at large, from harms caused by online platforms’ recommender systems optimised for short-term profit. 23.03.2026 Text