Positions

Positions

Response to the notion addressed by the special investigation commission formed to explain the Pegasus use in Poland

Panoptykon and Helsinki Foundation of Human Rights responded to the notion directed to us by Marcin Bosacki, MP, requiring if the two organisations directed complaints to the European Court of Human Rights regarding the use of Pegasus or similar spyware agains Polish citizens

Panoptykon’s opinion on the proposed Law of electronic communication

Joint Submission on the Commission’s Guidelines for Providers of VLOPs and VLOSEs on the Mitigation of Systemic Risks for Electoral Processes

Part 1 introduces how recommender systems contribute to systemic risks.

Part 2 responds to the Commission’s proposals to moderate virality of content that threatens the integrity of the electoral process.

Safe by Default – Panoptykon Foundation and People vs BigTech’s Briefing

Moving away from engagement-based rankings towards safe, rights-respecting, and human centric recommender systems.

Opinion on proposed Law on foreigners and other laws

“Pay or ok”: noyb addresses the European Data Protection Board

Organizacje broniące prywatności apelują o sprzeciw wobec modelu „pay or okay”.

Letter to European Commissioner Breton: Tackling harmful recommender systems

Panoptykon’s opinion to the assumptions of the law implementing the DSA

Position of social organizations on the government draft law on protection of whistleblowers

We joined the position of the Stefan Batory Foundation on the draft law on the protection of whistleblowers.